News – Brann

Decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in C-339/22 – BSH Hausgeräte GmbH v Electrolux AB

25 February 2025, the CJEU, in Case C-339/22, BSH Hausgeräte GmbH v Electrolux AB, addressed important matters regarding jurisdiction [...]

Decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in C-339/22 – BSH Hausgeräte GmbH v Electrolux ABDaniel Perttu2025-06-04T10:31:11+02:00

Newly established modified way of calculating the duration of SPCs in Sweden results in 1 (one) additional day of protection

2024-12-19: In a decision (PMÄ 7804-24) dated November 11, 2024, the Swedish Patent and Market Court (PMD) states that [...]

Newly established modified way of calculating the duration of SPCs in Sweden results in 1 (one) additional day of protectionDaniel Perttu2024-12-19T16:02:49+01:00

The Unified Patent Court, Nordic-Baltic Regional Division in Stockholm – No Stay due to Parallel EPO Opposition Proceedings

2024-12-17: 11 December 2024, through the procedural order ORD_65290/2024, the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division of the Unified Patent Court (UPC), [...]

The Unified Patent Court, Nordic-Baltic Regional Division in Stockholm – No Stay due to Parallel EPO Opposition ProceedingsDaniel Perttu2024-12-17T10:07:13+01:00

The Gilette Defense does not work at the UPC

2024-11-29:The decision by the UPC (Unified Patent Court) Local Division in Düsseldorf in the case UPC_CFI_373/2023, delivered on 31 October [...]

The Gilette Defense does not work at the UPCDaniel Perttu2024-11-29T09:26:39+01:00

The Unified Patent Court, Nordic-Baltic Regional Division in Stockholm – If the Parties and the Cause of Action are Not the Same, UPC Maintains Jurisdiction Even If Earlier National Parallel Proceedings Exist

2024-11-14: 29 October 2024, through the order ORD_16070/2014, the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division of the Unified Patent Court (UPC), decided [...]

The Unified Patent Court, Nordic-Baltic Regional Division in Stockholm – If the Parties and the Cause of Action are Not the Same, UPC Maintains Jurisdiction Even If Earlier National Parallel Proceedings ExistPixine Lyckner2024-11-14T15:11:31+01:00

The Unified Patent Court, Nordic-Baltic Regional Division in Stockholm – Counterclaim for Revocation Must include All the Grounds for Revocation, the Facts and Evidence Relied On

2024-10-15: 7 October 2024, through the preliminary order ORD_55063/2024 in the case UPC_CFI_430-2023, the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division of the [...]

The Unified Patent Court, Nordic-Baltic Regional Division in Stockholm – Counterclaim for Revocation Must include All the Grounds for Revocation, the Facts and Evidence Relied OnDaniel Perttu2024-10-15T15:41:16+02:00

The Unified Patent Court, Nordic-Baltic Regional Division in Stockholm – No Public Access to the Proceedings before Conclusion thereof

2024-09-27: 18 September 2024, through the procedural order UPC_CFI_8/2023, the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) [...]

The Unified Patent Court, Nordic-Baltic Regional Division in Stockholm – No Public Access to the Proceedings before Conclusion thereofDaniel Perttu2024-09-27T09:31:09+02:00

The Unified Patent Court, Nordic-Baltic Regional Division in Stockholm – No Stay During the Written Procedure

2024-09-16: 20 August 2024, through the procedural order ORD_16663/2024, the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division of the Unified Patent Court (UPC), [...]

The Unified Patent Court, Nordic-Baltic Regional Division in Stockholm – No Stay During the Written ProcedureDaniel Perttu2024-09-16T16:17:43+02:00

The Unified Patent Court, Nordic-Baltic Regional Division in Stockholm – No Security for Legal Costs Needed for a Non-EU Party with Adequate Assets and Willingness to Pay

2024-09-16: 20 August 2024, through the procedural order ORD_14940/2024, the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division of the Unified Patent Court (UPC), [...]

The Unified Patent Court, Nordic-Baltic Regional Division in Stockholm – No Security for Legal Costs Needed for a Non-EU Party with Adequate Assets and Willingness to PayDaniel Perttu2024-09-17T10:04:58+02:00

Our IP Stars

We are very proud to once again be announced as Tier 2 for Trademark prosecution and Tier 3 for Trademark disputes [...]

Our IP StarsPixine Lyckner2024-06-10T09:38:23+02:00